Church on the edge
Was part of a great book discussion today on David Bosh’s crazy-good, often referred to, yet under appreciated Transforming Mission. Bosch’s book is one of those that for some reason I have never got around to reading – until now. So glad I am. Beyond the reading, the discussions look like they will be both fun and challenging. It’s nice to talk with a bunch of people who have hearts that resonate, and “get” one another. So, we can dive deeper than just discussing theological/philosophical concepts to why and how it matters for our lives. I think that just maybe we will find some ways to put parts into practice together as well. Tom, Cobus, and Chris have written about this conversation/their thoughts. I am sure that Sure Joe will as well (especially since I just called him out).
So much that I would like to comment on, but I’ll save for other posts. For now, maybe just a quote from the end of the chapter we were discussing. I didn’t get a chance to say anything in our group, so here’s my chance…
In discussing the ways in which the early church participated in living signs of the Kingdom, Bosch maintains that they did so in a manner consistent with Jesus. However, they failed in at least 3 ways. First, the early church too quickly established what separated themselves from others rather than their calling and responsibility toward these others. Second, the movement turned into an institution. Third, the growing church marginalized the Jews (those from whom they were birthed). Those of you who have studied organizations know that these are pretty common in the life cycle of any movement. We always wonder how to influence the process so that institutionalization/fossilization doesn’t take place in some inevitable fashion. I would dare say that this has happened with the emerging church in the USA (but Tony, I think you have wisely and subversively multiplied influence by deconstruction, perhaps preempting the process? – yet another blog post I should write).
Then Bosch throws in this little nugget that has left me thinking a lot: “Very few people can be both at the periphery and at the center at the same time. And even if they do manage that, they usually do so only for a very short while” (52). Crap! We’re trying so hard to be a church for all people. A place where homeless and affluent rub shoulders, where radical discipleship is the norm, not the exception. Are you saying we can’t live on the edge and in the middle of society?
Bosch is right, I think. All my years (oh so many years, at that) seem to point that way. You choose to live on the edge or at the center. Lots of young, excited, or naive people get started on the fringes. What usually happens over time? They get sucked toward the middle. They become jaded, disenchanted, tired of fighting the system, or just plain selfish. The middle has a strong pull, doesn’t it? But I repeat: YOU CAN CHOOSE TO LIVE ON THE EDGE OR AT THE CENTER.
The edge is scary, risky, exciting, unknown, and the place of miracles because God is needed. It’’s real reality, the “thin place” where heaven and earth come close together. It’s the place of angels and demons. It’s where we see God’s Kingdom coming. It’s where I want to be. If I must choose between the periphery and center, I choose the edge.
I choose the edge.

Comments(2)