So, we are down to 8 teams remaining in the 2010 World Cup: Uruguay, Ghana, Netherlands, Brazil, Argentina, Germany, Paraguay, and Spain. Note there are 4 South American teams, 3 European teams, and 1 African team in that mix. I like that spread and think the next round will be just as good as this first knockout round has been. I can tell you that is has been amazing to here while it is all going on, and we’ve been in several cities, stadiums, fan zones, and other venues to take it all in. Dream come true for me.
I wanted to take a second to point out a few of the “winners” of the world cup so far. Not game winners, mind you, but sort of random stuff I have noticed – others who are coming out well.
1. Those Nike boots (cleats) with the orange heels.

Apparently these are the Nike Elite series, Mercurial something or other. Honestly, I hate Nike, and think of them as johnny-come-latelys with a lot money for advertising in soccer. But I’m old school like that. Either these shoes are legit (because it seems like 80% of the players are wearing them) or they have given some serious incentives to players to show off their shoes on the world stage. Probably a bit of both…
2. Puma 
Adidas has always been the biggest sponsors/suppliers for soccer. In the current world cup, 12 of the teams are wearing Adidas kits (jerseys). I expect that. And, I generally like their uniforms. Next come Nike, supplying for 9 of the teams. Of course, they are supplying for some of the big/popular boys like Brazil and the USA. Add those shoes and I think Nike has really done well this world cup. BUT PUMA!! You may or may not know that Puma was started by one of the 2 guys that had also started Adidas. Or, you may just know them from all the teenagers wearing their overly-narrow shoes. For me, they are always in the ad game, but not big players. And then I started pointing out the teams who are wearing Puma this world cup. There are 7 – can you name them without looking at the Puma site? Hey, 7 is not 12, but it’s a lot for Puma to have in the tournament.
3. The Vuvuzela
Friends, before the world cup, I have never seen a white person with a vuvuzela. I have heard them aplenty at local soccer matches. But not at other sports, And not from whities. Then there was the big to-do over whether they would be banned and all the Euro-fans complaining about the noise and how low-brow it was. Really, noise at a sporting event? Crazy. And then FIFA said, “well it’s in Africa and that’s what they do, so we’ll let it go.” And being here, I can tell you that EVERYONE has at least one vuvuzela. It’s nuts. My kids took one and added some flair and are convinced they are going to start some sort of business. The vuvuzela has really become a global phenomenon.

4. South Africa
Remember how there was all that talk about could South Africa even pull off the world cup? Did we need a back-up country? Would it be safe? Was there enough transport? Are there enough hotels? Well, take that! SA has done amazing. Lots of fun, safe, hospitable. A friend’s mom pointed out that this is the most people who have ever been in the country (accounting for population growth + a TON of visitors all at once). I am so glad. And i hope everyone has a great time while here. I mean, I’m not surprised – we love it here. And glad that others are getting a first-hand look at why.
Can’t wait to see how the rest of the tournament goes, but these are a few of the things that have stood out so far for me. Would LOVE to hear what you think has been noticeable/successful so far…


Thank you, Arthur. I have been excited about all the action in South Africa with the World Cup there. I wish I was there with all of you to feel the real thing.
i’m going to touch on the noticeable.
1 – rough calls by refs that the whole world is calling them out on. i know ‘to err is human’, and every tournament has bad calls, but this tournament seems to have too many. too bad.
2 – flopping. i know it has developed over years and years into part of the game, and practically every player (good or bad, world-famous or not) does it, but it is ridiculous. it’s embarassing to watch. it slows the game down. it causes fouls that shouldn’t be called. it causes yellow cards that shouldn’t be called. and i think it brings just a little bit of discrace to the game (the game that i truely do love).
part of me wants to justify flopping by saying that television makes it easily seen/caught. if you were watching a game live/in person (with no tv or replays and such), you would see many of these acts as fouls and not flops. but i can’t. in person or on tv, it is still happening when it shouldn’t be.
there is no justifying the degree that it’s gotten to. seeing 10 replays from 6 angles, and seeing that a guy is holding his face when he got kicked in the shin. and that a guy is writhing on the ground, inches from death…until a card is given so he can get up and take posession. or that nobody touched him at all, yet he goes down like he was shot. it makes me feel shame. it really does.
aside from fouls and flopping though, i love this game and look forward to the matches on saturday.
Thumbs up: the ref from Uzbekistan – he was tops.
Thumbs down: to Uruguay, who cheated their way to the semi-finals.